Cat/Dog

Arizona Animal–Massage Therapists Sue for Access to Veterinary Patients

Despite the growing popularity of the One Health movement to “forge co-equal, all-inclusive collaborations between physicians, osteopaths, veterinarians, dentists, nurses, and other scientific-health and environmentally related disciplines,”1 practitioners must reckon with regulatory requirements regarding who can practice on which species, in which state and with what modality. The laws on this are confusing, continually evolving and differ between states, especially when it concerns practices such as anesthesia-free dentistry, farriery and complementary/alternative therapy (e.g., chiropractic, massage,2 etc.), unless one also has a license to practice veterinary medicine in that state.3 Thus, those joining forces in the spirit of One Health must at the same time recognize regulatory requirements instated with the goal of safeguarding the health and welfare of people, animals and public health. Or alternatively, as three massage therapists have decided to do in Arizona, sue the state board in order to gain access to animals.4 Arizona defines the practice of veterinary medicine as including veterinary surgery, obstetrics, dentistry, acupuncture, manipulation and all other branches or specialties of veterinary medicine. It exempts from this definition certified equine dental practitioners who work under the general supervision of a licensed veterinarian, animal owners or employees, and …